I dislike the idea of raising broad questions without actually attempting to push the ball down the field a bit, as it were. So, while I doubt that I’ll come to any definitive conclusions about many of the matters I raise in this blog, I’d like to think that I’ve at least made some kind of progress measurable in terms of more precise definitions of terms and/or sub-questions along with some footholds in the literature that’s out there.
This being a blog, however, I’m bound to leave a number of threads hanging in mid-air. So I resolve to try not to leave too many out there at one time. In order to enforce a check on this behavior, I’ll periodically post lists of things I’ve merely put out to the universe without really giving any real critical examination. In other words, random bloviation may be useful from time to time as much for the pinpointing emotional fault lines as for general entertainment and steam-letting, but on the whole it’s useless for anyone who actually cares about the matters at hand.
Here’s a current list of things I need to get back to, along with a few potential prompts:
1-The status of myth and fact in the Information age
-C. S. Lewis on Myth become Fact
-Snopes
2- The definition of Modernism viz-a-viz Primitivism and Futurism
-R. Scruton’s “An Intelligent Person’s Guide to Modern Culture”
3-Language as Instrument vs. Language as Act
-Saussure
-Lacan
-Heidegger (Crap…this one’s going to take a while…)
4-Behavioral Mimicry in Child Development
-Um…not sure where to go on this one. The sources I’m familiar with for child development are by and large for moral development and the individual’s definition personal need fulfillment (e.g., Piaget, Erickson, Maslow, Gilligan, etc.), of which I’m now wondering whether much has taken into account the Behaviorist side of the coin, which is where the concept of mimicry seems like it might have got its roots. On that score, start with Skinner and work upward.
5- Tolerance: Different approaches for different contexts.
-Hmm…another topic that’s way too broad. Let’s see…I suppose I’ll approach this as a question of social ethics…which means philosophy in general…which means I’ve got my work cut out for me on this one…back to Plato and hit all the main stops on the way up.